Walking

The Map Is Not the Adventure: Reading Rebecca Solnit’s A Field Guide to Getting Lost

by

I took a different street home the other day.

There was no great expedition in it. I was walking back through Southam by a route I know too well, heading toward the familiar turn that gets me home with the least fuss. Then I thought: I could go that way instead. I had no errand on that street. No appointment. No shop to visit. It was a residential stretch of town, the kind of road I had probably passed a hundred times without giving it a glance because it had never offered anything I needed.

That was the point.

A Field Guide to Getting Lost - Rebecca Solnit

I walked it anyway. The houses had a different feel. The street had its own arrangement of front gardens, parked cars, brickwork, hedges, caravans, and small human decisions. Nothing spectacular happened. I did not discover a portal in the pavement or receive a message from a crow. I just entered a portion of my own town that had remained invisible because convenience had made it irrelevant.

That small diversion has been sitting beside my reading of Rebecca Solnit’s A Field Guide to Getting Lost. Solnit’s book is full of bigger territory: deserts, artists, explorers, blue distance, memory, loss, death, wilderness, the strange gap between where we are and where we thought we were going. But it has made me think again about the domestic scale of getting lost. How much of our world disappears because we know the quickest route? How much of ourselves disappears because we have accepted a plan before we have tested whether it belongs to us?

This is not a standard book review. I am not going to march through the contents, hand out marks, and tell you who should purchase it. I want to stay closer to the experience of reading it. Solnit has written a book that gives wandering a form. It keeps setting off from one subject, finding an adjacent path, allowing history, landscape, art, grief, philosophy, and personal memory to change the pressure of the original question. Then, when you have forgotten where the question began, she brings you back to it from another direction.

That is one reason I loved it. It is also why the book has left me thinking about walking, blogging, inherited life plans, GPS, the old pleasure of getting a map wrong, and the part of us that wants somebody else to tell us what to do next.

The human appetite for a map

Most of us want a map. We want the plan, the route, the reassuring sense that the person at the wheel knows where the road is going. We want to know that the job will lead somewhere, that the relationship is on schedule, that the decision is sensible, that our identity holds together when somebody asks what we do.

There is nothing foolish about wanting security. A map can keep you from walking over a cliff. A plan can help you feed a family, meet a deadline, recover from a crisis, or find your way home before dark. I used to love rock climbing and mountain walking, and I have never confused adventure with a refusal to prepare. A compass, a map, some knowledge of the weather, enough food, an honest sense of your own ability: these things matter.

But a map can also become a substitute for contact with the territory.

Before the phone put an OS map and a blue dot in every pocket, you could get properly twisted around. A riverbed might not be where you expected it to be. A path might be overgrown. A ridge might look different from the angle you approached it. You worked with map and compass, corrected your bearings, checked the ground against the paper, and slowly found your way through. The point was not to be incompetent. The point was to be in a live relationship with the world.

Now I can walk almost anywhere with the comforting knowledge that a glowing rectangle knows exactly where I stand. That is an extraordinary convenience, and I am glad to have it when I need it. Yet something has changed. GPS can tell me my location without asking anything of my attention. It can preserve me from the experience of not knowing where I am.

The same thing happens in the wider life. We inherit maps before we can inspect them. Get married. Get a job. Buy a house. Have children. Build a respectable career. Keep moving. Do not make a mess. Do not disappoint anyone. I grew up in New Jersey. I had no idea that I would spend much of my adult life in England, that I would be living here twenty-six years later, married, writing this from a town I could not have placed on a map when I was young.

Life had other plans, or perhaps life had no plan at all and kept offering turns I could not see from the starting point. Either way, I have had to lose the plan more than once.

That is why Solnit’s central question catches me so hard:

“How will you go about finding that thing the nature of which is totally unknown to you?”

It is an old philosophical puzzle, but it also describes the ordinary predicament of being alive. The thing you need may not be something you can identify in advance. It may arrive as a place, a person, a vocation, a grief, a book, a thought you only meet once you have moved beyond the territory you know how to name.

The dark is not empty

Solnit writes: “Leave the door open for the unknown, the door into the dark.” It is a sentence with the force of a threshold. The dark here does not mean evil. Nor does it require us to treat mystery as supernatural proof of anything. The dark is the unknown: the unplanned part of a life, the territory that has not yet yielded its terms.

That dark can frighten us because the known gives us a temporary sense of control. We know our role. We know the route home. We know what gets rewarded. We know which version of ourselves other people recognise. Step past that edge and the old signals weaken. You have to listen harder.

There is a line in Solnit’s book, drawing on Walter Benjamin, that has stayed with me:

“To be lost is to be fully present, and to be fully present is to be capable of being in uncertainty and mystery.” I recognise that from the mountains.

Snowdonia has long felt like a spiritual home to me. I can remember stopping on a hill walk and looking out at the vastness around me: old mountains, distance, weather moving through the valleys, and little old me in the middle of it. The endless internal chatter begins to fall away. I am no longer sorting email, rehearsing conversations, checking the clock, or trying to solve the whole rest of my life. My body is on the path. My attention belongs to the ground, the climb, the weather, the next step.

It happens on a long trek with particular force. On the Camino de Santiago, the life I had brought with me seemed to melt off over days of walking. The journey has its own rhythm. You wake, walk, eat, rest, walk again. But the same thing can happen on a local Wisdom Walk. One steep climb is not required. A person can leave the phone in the pocket, skip the route tracking, turn onto an unfamiliar street, and become more available to what is already there.

Camino de Santiago

This is where getting lost becomes something other than escape. It is not disappearing from your life. It is arriving in it.

Adventure with a margin

I do not think getting lost means throwing caution into the hedge and calling the result freedom. The wilderness has no obligation to reward our fantasies. The road does not care whether we have read enough philosophy. A person can get in over their head, physically or psychologically. The old stories understood this. When the hero crosses the threshold, there is no guarantee of return. Some people do not come back because they die. Others do not come back because the strange territory seduces them into losing contact with the world they left.

A writer I once read classified adventure on a scale that ran from harmless outings through to encounters where death became a serious possibility. His point, as I remember it, was that the best adventures sit somewhere near the middle: difficult enough to demand all your attention and skill, dangerous enough to heighten the senses, yet still within your capacity to navigate if you stay awake.

That feels right to me. I have always liked adventure with some control parameters. The best edge is often where you do not know the outcome but you have enough resourcefulness to meet it. You know what to do when you do not know what to do.

That phrase names a kind of personal power. Not power over other people. Not the inflated confidence of somebody selling a system online. Personal power means sovereignty over your own attention and behaviour when the familiar plan stops working. You cannot master the unknown. The unknown keeps moving. The minute you enter a new territory and learn its shape, another edge appears beyond it.

The skill lies elsewhere. You build enough inner authority to cross the next boundary without handing your life over to panic, imitation, or the first confident person who claims to have the answer.

Our culture has made that last temptation very easy. Open YouTube, Instagram, X, or any platform where advice wears a clean shirt and a polished thumbnail, and someone will explain the route. Start this business. Follow this system. Escape the nine-to-five. Become the person you were meant to be. The internet can teach us almost anything. It can also make it look as if everybody else has solved the riddle of being alive.

I know people whose online presence makes their life look assembled, evolved, and complete. Behind the scenes, they are as confused as the rest of us. That is not a moral failure. It is simply a reminder that presentation is not knowledge. A neat map can be an advertisement for certainty rather than evidence of it.

I wrote recently about the story that wants you at your desk, the inherited script that tells us obedience, legibility, and future reward are the only adult forms of life. Solnit’s book belongs beside that question. Getting lost can be a refusal of the approved diagram. It can also be a gentler act: putting the diagram down long enough to see whether another life is trying to make itself known.

A book that wanders on purpose

Solnit does not merely argue for this kind of openness. She writes it.

That is what makes A Field Guide to Getting Lost more than an elegant collection of observations about uncertainty. The chapters are mini explorations. They set out with one pressure and return by a route you could not have predicted. She moves through art, landscape, personal memory, historical material, colour, desire, loss, and the particular lives of people who have lived close to absence. The diversions do not feel like ornaments. They change what the central idea can mean.

I love writing that works this way. I love the moment when a book gives you a point of departure, then lets the mind travel. A remembered scene opens into history. A journey through a place opens into literature. A philosophical question gets returned to the body, the room, the road, a human voice. You make detours, yet the detours are the actual route.

Robert Twigger’s How to Be a Man in the Lousy Modern World does something similar, running the account of a man living through pregnancy and impending fatherhood alongside an inquiry into masculinity. In Robert D. Kaplan’s Balkan Ghosts, travel through actual ground continually opens out into cultural memory, politics, history, and books, before bringing the reader back to a road, a border, a city, a body in motion. Christopher Ross’s Tunnel Vision: Journeys of an Underground Philosopher has that same ability to make place and thought speak to each other.

This is the kind of prose I want to keep learning from. It does not use the world as scenery for a thesis. It lets the world interrupt the thesis.

Solnit’s “blue” sections are part of that method. She has described needing more space as the book developed, and blue becomes more than a way of extending the work. It becomes distance, longing, sky, water, the colour that keeps receding as you approach it. The book gains room to breathe. It can follow a thought past the point where a more efficient writer would close the paragraph and move on.

That may sound indulgent to somebody trained to judge every page by speed and utility. I think it is a form of intellectual hospitality. Solnit gives the reader enough room to have associations of their own. She does not lock every door behind her.

For a writer, this is liberating. An essay does not have to behave like a corporate presentation with a conclusion waiting at the bottom. It can be an ecology. It can wander without becoming vague. It can keep faith with a question long enough for unexpected companions to arrive.

The hearth after the wandering

This is also why the book has refreshed something in my sense of blogging.

I have often thought of myself as an explorer of minds and territories, a pathfinder who goes out to see what is there and comes back to tell the story. The exploration can happen in mountains, in a local town, on the web, through hypertext, in a book, on a long walk, in the odd archive trail that begins with one note and ends somewhere nobody could have planned.

The blog is where I come back.

When I was podcasting more heavily, I used to think of the podcast as a twenty-first-century campfire. The blog has that function too. It is the hearth. You return from the walk or the rabbit hole, sit down among other people, and say: I found this. I do not know whether it is useful to you, but it altered something in me.

That is a different relationship to writing from the one offered by the modern advice economy. The blogger does not have to be the person who possesses the final map. The blogger can be the person who leaves a trace. A map made after wandering is not the same as an instruction manual. It can say where somebody has been without pretending that another person should retrace every footstep.

The hope is not that readers will adopt my worldview. I would rather the piece loosened something. I would rather a reader stopped and wondered: Where did this belief come from? Whose plan am I carrying? What might happen if I took a different turn? Then the comments become part of the work. I share an experience; another person shares theirs; both of us see a little farther. The blog becomes closer to Socrates in the marketplace than a stage where the expert delivers answers.

This is why Narrative Alchemy begins with attention to the stories already running inside us. Stories are code. They organise what we notice, what we fear, what feels possible, and the kinds of future we can imagine. A belief can act like a route we have walked so often that it becomes invisible.

The breadcrumb exercise is one way of stepping off it. Choose a belief and ask where it came from. Who gave it to you? What experience fixed it in place? What purpose did it once serve? Then ask the more awkward question: does it still belong to you? The work is not to fling away every old belief in a fit of rebellion. Some maps contain hard-won wisdom. The work is to notice that a map is a map, not reality itself.

A small field guide of your own

Solnit’s book has not persuaded me to seek danger for its own sake. It has reminded me that I do not need a grand expedition in order to practise an openness to the unknown.

Walk a street in your own town that has no obvious use. Leave the direct route to the high street and take the lane you have never taken because nobody you know lives there and nothing waits for you at the end. Drive by a road you normally ignore and take it, if it is safe to do so. Let the usual calculation of time and efficiency relax for an hour.

Or stay at home. Sit in the garden, make coffee, and follow one belief back through its breadcrumbs. “I have to be sensible.” “I cannot make a living from that.” “People like me do not do that.” “I should know what I am doing by now.” Do not attack the belief. Ask it where it came from. It may have arrived through school, family worry, a humiliation, a reward, an old act of love, a world that has changed around you. Knowing its source does not settle the matter, but it can give you back a little choice.

That is enough for a beginning. You do not have to get lost in a desert. You do not need to throw away the map, the job, the marriage, or the responsibilities that make a life possible. You only need to find one place where the map has become too sure of itself and loosen your grip.

A Field Guide to Getting Lost is an excellent treatise on getting lost because it never turns lostness into a cheap slogan about reinvention. It knows the dark is real. It knows that loss can hurt, that uncertainty has consequences, that the world remains larger than our desire to explain it. Yet it keeps the door open.

Read it if you want a book that will not rush to rescue you from the questions it raises. Read it if you like prose that thinks by wandering, circling, and returning. Read it if you have spent too long following a route because it is the route you know.

Then go out. Take the wrong turn on purpose. Or sit quietly with the belief you have never questioned. You may not find the thing you are looking for. That is the old problem. You may find the thing whose nature you did not yet know.

And that may be where you begin to find yourself.

If this post gave you something to carry into your day, consider supporting my work by buying me a coffee or making a monthly donation or subscribing (free) to the blog.

This morning I picked up How to Practice …

by

This morning I picked up How to Practice Self-Inquiry by Ramana Maharshi. I expected a quick survey read, a reconnaissance mission into the territory of the question Who am I? Instead, before I had travelled very far into the book, another question appeared:

Is this your game? Is this your true mission?

I could almost locate the voice physically. I raised my left hand as though it were speaking from that side of my brain. It wasn’t dismissing the book. Intellectually, I find the whole thing fascinating: the idea of following the sense of “I” backwards, beyond name, history, personality and role, towards whatever remains when all the usual answers have fallen away.

But fascination is not necessarily vocation.

As I sat there thinking about consciousness, another whisper began pointing elsewhere—back towards The Feminist Art of Walking, towards psychogeography and mythogeography, towards the work I have been doing around movement, place and the conversation between the inner and outer worlds.

That is where the energy seems to be.

As I understood it this morning, Ramana’s method moves inward by subtraction. Sit still. Withdraw attention from the world. Follow each thought back to the one who is thinking it. Ask who is afraid, who is curious, who is restless, who is asking the question. Keep tracing the “I” towards its source.

There is something beautiful and rigorous about that. But there is also a part of me that resists the image of consciousness as a room I must enter and seal behind me.

My own inquiry seems to begin when I leave the room.

I experience myself through contact with the world: walking through fields, streets, ruins, footpaths and forgotten corners; noticing signs, overhearing fragments of conversation, encountering weather and history; allowing a place to disturb the familiar arrangement of my thoughts. The landscape does not merely provide a backdrop for reflection. It participates in the reflection. It interrupts, provokes, remembers and responds.

Perhaps I do not discover myself by withdrawing from the world, but by entering more deeply into relationship with it.

The question, then, may not be simply:

Who am I?

It may be:

Who am I here?

Or:

Who do I become in contact with this place?

What does this street awaken in me? What does this landscape remember on my behalf? Which part of me appears only when I am moving? What does the world call into speech that would otherwise remain silent?

This feels like a form of self-inquiry, but one conducted through encounter rather than retreat. An ambulatory self-inquiry. The inquiry is distributed across body, place, memory, history and imagination. My feet become part of the thinking apparatus. The route becomes a line of thought drawn across the land.

Movement is not a distraction from contemplation. It is the engine of it.

Perhaps the value of Ramana’s book, for me, will not be that it persuades me to adopt his method exactly. Its value may lie in the contrast it creates. It shows me one path towards the self clearly enough that I can recognise the shape of my own.

His path says: strip the world away and discover what remains.

Mine may be saying: enter the world more fully and discover what emerges.

So the question Who am I? remains, but it refuses to sit still. It wants weather. It wants roads, thresholds, voices, ruins and chance encounters. It wants to be carried into the world and allowed to change as the landscape changes.

Perhaps I am not a monk of consciousness.

Perhaps I am a walker in the world.

I’ve been carrying a small psychogeographic instruction around …

by

I’ve been carrying a small psychogeographic instruction around with me: unfold a map, put a glass down anywhere, draw round its rim, then go out and walk the circle as closely as the streets allow. This is a low tech version of the deríve app I made last week.

It’s a lovely bit of mischief because it gives the walk a rule without getting to complicated. The line is arbitrary, yet the body has to negotiate it: the cul-de-sac, the dual carriageway, the bit of private land, the pub garden, the place where the tidy circle becomes a long awkward detour. The map makes a proposition, and the street answers back.

Robert Macfarlane’s version says to record the “textual run-off” as you go: graffiti, branded litter, snatches of conversation, visual rhymes, whatever keeps catching on the mind. A walk doesn’t need a grand revelation to become material. It only needs attention and a way of catching what sticks to it.

I like that the instruction ends with the circle and the record ending together. There’s a discipline in it. You don’t have to turn every walk into a project, a lesson, or a little performance for the screen. You walk the strange line you drew, make a few marks, and come home with whatever the streets were prepared to give you.

Maybe that’s enough. A route, a notebook, a few scraps of the world.

With thanks to Robert Macfarlane, “A Road of One’s Own.”

A walk is never just a walk. The …

by

A walk is never just a walk.

The ground beneath our feet is layered with stories. Streets carry memories. Landscapes hold arguments. A statue, a sign, a fence, an empty building – each one quietly tells us something about power, belonging, and how we are allowed to move through the world.

Smith’s radical walker becomes part explorer, part artist, part troublemaker. Someone who looks for the cracks. Someone who questions the map they have been handed.

But what I enjoyed about Wilson’s reflection is that he doesn’t simply follow the trail. He pushes back. He questions the radical angle:

Must every walk become an act of resistance?
Must every footstep carry a manifesto?

Maybe walking’s magic is that it refuses to stay in one lane. It can challenge, bear witness, or be a source of wonder. Likewise, the walker can hack the city, listen to the forest, or simply drift.

And perhaps the cyberflâneur does the same thing in another landscape — following hyperlinks instead of footpaths, wandering through forgotten corners of the web, looking for traces left behind.

Each path changes the walker.
Each walker changes the path.

In reply to 51. Phil Smith, Walking’s New Movement: Opportunities, Decelerations and Beautiful Obstacles in the Performances, Politics, Philosophies and Spaces of Contemporary Radical Walking – Reading and Walking.

The Rucksack, the Drift, and the Thinking Walk

by

I have been thinking about walking. This week has clarified something about why.

You stay alive to your life by staying in motion. The physical motion is part of it. The attention staying awake is the larger part. The question underneath: Do you have a practice that holds? A real one, lived rather than intended, that keeps the self porous and curious and in genuine contact with the actual world.

This is what Japhy Ryder understood. In The Dharma Bums, he has a vision: thousands of young Americans walking into the mountains with rucksacks on their backs, refusing the dream of the box, the car, the television flickering in every window at the same hour on every street. The rucksack on the back is proof of something. You’ve got what you need. You can go anywhere. The road is still there.

Guy Debord called the drift the dérive. The unplanned walk that follows what the Situationists called psychogeographic pulls: the alley that looks interesting, the hill appearing over rooftops, the smell you can’t identify that makes you turn left. The environment has its own intelligence. The dérive asks you to submit to it for a while. Go out without a destination. Come back having been somewhere you didn’t plan to go.

These two traditions, Kerouac’s rucksack revolution and Debord’s dérive, have always sat in separate rooms in my mind. One is wilderness, one is urban. One is spiritual, one is political. But this week I see what they share: both are practices of refusal. Both insist that the narrowing is a choice.

The wisdom walk is the thread that connects them. The older, quieter idea that walking itself is a form of thinking. That the body in motion produces a quality of attention that the desk can’t replicate. That ideas arrive on the path that won’t come any other way. Thoreau knew it. The Peripatetics knew it. The pilgrim walking to the Holy Land, à la Sainte Terre, knew it. Thoreau traced the word saunter back to those pilgrims. Every walk is a pilgrimage if you take it seriously enough.

This morning, before the day got going, I spent a few hours with Claude working on the about page, the worldview piece, and the values. The shape of things has never felt clearer. The vault as the living memory layer. Notes, fragments, essays, experiments. The snapshot photography coming back. The narrative alchemy coaching. The text-based ontologist stepping fully into the role: language as the primary instrument, the web as the native medium, the walk as the thinking engine.

At fifty-seven, I wrote: Act III is the reclamation. At fifty-eight, watching Roger leave with the top down and sitting with what this week has been, I understand it more bodily than I did. The cosmic dancer surrenders to the rhythm of the turning wheel. Actively, with great intention, having seen what the alternative looks like.

The rucksack revolution belongs to anyone who understands what the alternative looks like.

The recipe: go out without a fixed route. Carry what you need and nothing more. Let the environment pull you where it wants. Follow the thought that arrives. Trust that the thinking will happen if you stay present to it.

The walk is the answer. It has always been the answer. The question is whether you take it.

I’m going home to the Midlands this afternoon. Back to the flatlands.

THE RITUAL OF SACRED STEPS

by

A soul-guided reflection for transforming an ordinary walk into a mythic pilgrimage.

PRELUDE: THE INVOCATION
Before you step outside, pause.

Stand at the threshold of your door—literal or symbolic.
Place one hand on your chest. Feel your breath. Feel your weight.
Now, whisper an intention—not a goal, but a summons.

Ask:
What part of me is seeking movement today?
What question do I want to carry in my body, not just my mind?
What might the soul reveal if I listened with my feet?

This is your inner compass. Let it guide you.

ACT I: THE WALK AS WAKING DREAM
As you begin to walk, do not rush. This is not exercise. This is exorcism, initiation, encounter.

Let each step be deliberate. Grounded. Attuned.

Notice:

  • The texture of the path beneath you—stone, earth, asphalt, memory.
  • The sounds around you—birdcall, wind through leaves, distant traffic as modern drums.
  • The feelings that rise as you walk—irritation, joy, longing, stillness. They are not distractions. They are messages.

Hold your question in silence. Let it echo. Don’t force answers. The soul speaks in symbols and sensations, not soundbites.

ACT II: THE THRESHOLD MOMENT
At some point, you will cross an invisible line—a turning point in the walk.
Maybe it’s a particular tree, a bench, or a shadow crossing the sidewalk.

Stop here.
This is the axis mundi of your pilgrimage.

Ask:
What am I ready to release?
What am I being invited to receive?
What story am I stepping out of—and which one am I stepping into?

Mark this moment. Say something aloud. A phrase. A truth. A vow.

ACT III: THE RETURN
The walk back is never the same as the walk out.
You’ve crossed the threshold. You carry new eyes.

Notice:

  • What feels different, even if nothing has changed
  • What you’re bringing home—not just insights, but energy.
  • What action this pilgrimage asks of you next.

When you reach your doorway again, pause.
Touch the threshold. Thank the road. Thank your feet.
Thank the question that walked with you.

POSTLUDE: THE JOURNALING RITE
When you return, take 10 minutes to write—
What did I encounter on the path today that I wouldn’t have noticed without intention?
What wants to be remembered?
What myth am I now leaning into?

This isn’t just a walk. It’s a return to the temple of your own awareness.
It’s remembering that even in your neighbourhood, you are never far from the sacred.
The road is always waiting. The question is always calling.

Walking as Art: When the Journey Becomes the Practice

by

I’m out here again, tracing a familiar loop around Southam. It’s one of my most frequented walking trails—a three-mile circuit I can almost navigate with my eyes closed. But today, I’m taking it in with new eyes, and maybe with a new purpose. Walking, which has always been a part of me, has taken on a fresh dimension. It’s something more than exercise, more than a commute from Point A to Point B. This walk has become an art practice.

What does it mean, though, to walk as art? It’s a question that’s been unfolding with every step. Walking art, the *dérive*, the drift, is not about getting anywhere in particular. It’s about moving with the currents of intuition, letting each step be guided by the whims of attention. Unlike a prescribed path, this is a walk of curiosity, of following whatever catches the eye, of dipping down alleys and paths I’ve never travelled before. 

For many people, walking has become utilitarian. We move from inside space to inside space, getting from the warmth of home to the shelter of the office, rarely taking time to simply wander. But the dérive is different. It’s about embracing the unknown, treating the landscape as a series of invitations. Each turn, each stretch of path, becomes a chapter in the unfolding story of where I’m meant to go, if only for this one walk.  

I love the psychogeography of it all—feeling into the energy of the places I pass, picking up on the echoes and vibes embedded in the spaces around me. This track I’m on, for instance, is a beloved one among local dog walkers, an afternoon stroll kind of path, a “let’s go get some fresh air” path. But I use it as my thinking circuit, my field for mental wanderings. Here, I work out what’s on my mind, let the rhythm of my footsteps lull me into reflection. This is no ordinary walk; it’s a drift into the landscape of my thoughts.

Today, my thoughts centre around this emerging practice of “walking as art.” There’s something about movement that transcends simply getting from place to place. Walking, I have found, engages mind, body, and spirit all at once. In one walk, I can clear the mental cobwebs, reflect on what’s stirring in my soul, and feel the physical satisfaction of moving through space, of encountering the world one step at a time. 

The idea of walking as art has opened up a new way of seeing each journey as an unfolding creation. It reminds me of performance art—the act itself is the art, and the trail becomes my canvas. I don’t need a destination. I only need to move, to engage with the environment around me, to let my feet lead me where they will. And because it’s a practice, I’ve decided to bring a few tools with me to capture these moments and deepen my experience. 

I have my trusty field recorder, the F2 Bluetooth from Zoom, which is just small enough to slip into my pocket. Its simplicity frees me from worrying about sound levels and lets me capture the experience of the walk hands-free. Alongside it, I’ve got my Meta Ray-Ban glasses to take photos and videos, capturing the landscape from my own vantage point. I also have my Insta360 Go, a small action camera that’s perfect for documenting my wanderings, and, of course, my iPhone. Each of these tools becomes part of the process, helping me document the walk as it unfolds.  

And in some way, these tools feel essential to the practice. They create a conduit for capturing, documenting, and reflecting on the act of walking, helping me map out the journey in new ways. I’m also using an app called Track My Journey that allows me to geotag locations, letting the journey unfold as a kind of interactive map. Along the way, I find myself capturing small details—a decrepit shed that has seen better days, the thick hoofprints of cows that have passed by. These are the things that catch my attention today—the little landmarks of this journey.

One of my favourite stops is the ancient Holy Well here in Southam, a Grade II listed building that carries its own lore and mystery. Legend has it that the well can cure blindness, and I’m struck by the idea of sight—of seeing and being seen, of recognising what we overlook in the world around us. The well has stood here for centuries, since 1761, inviting wanderers like myself to stop and feel into its presence. There’s something profound in these pauses, in seeing the landscape not as a series of tasks to accomplish but as a place to engage with fully.

I suppose this is what walking art offers me: a chance to be in motion yet rooted, a way to tune into both the outer world and my inner landscape. As I walk, my mind drifts. I think about the new life I’m trying to create here, the life where walking itself is an art practice in and of itself, where each step becomes a meditative act, a small way to weave mind, body, and spirit together. This art of walking feels like it holds everything—thought, movement, memory, and place.

In one sense, this whole process has brought me back to my blog, my digital garden at [soulcruzer.com](https://www.soulcruzer.com/). It’s there that I intend to capture this journey, to record my thoughts and experiences, to make this walking practice part of my work, my story. And I’ve come to realise that it’s a practice of tapping into the psyche, exploring our inner world as much as our outer one. I’ve stumbled upon a couple of books lately that have been helpful—Walking as an Art Practice and another on Mythogeography that’s a little more out there, but both point me toward this idea that walking can be an act of self-discovery, a way to understand who we are and how we’re shaped by the spaces we inhabit.

As I walk, I feel myself letting go of productivity, letting go of the need to measure every moment against what it could achieve. In this act of walking as art, time becomes something fluid, expansive, and filled with possibility. I don’t need to reach a destination because, here, the journey itself is enough.  

So here I am, walking through this patch of muddy track I know so well, thinking of all the hundreds of times I’ve walked this path, each time with something new on my mind. If I could capture each of those moments and create a time-lapse of all the thoughts that have surfaced on this loop, it would be pretty cool. And maybe, in some way, that’s exactly what I’m doing now—mapping out the inner geography of my life, one step, one thought at a time. 

For me, walking has become a reminder that we don’t need to be in a hurry and that sometimes the greatest discoveries come when we let the journey be its own kind of destination. This practice of walking art isn’t about productivity or perfection; it’s about honouring the path itself, letting each step create its own small story, adding another brushstroke to the art of being alive.