Field Notes

I keep seeing headlines about the new rules of attention, usually written by somebody who wants to sell a better way of getting hold of it.

The old rules were blunt enough. Interrupt people. Startle them. Keep them scrolling. Learn which colours, fears, desires and half-conscious wounds make a thumb hesitate for a second longer. Call it engagement. Invoice the result.

Nobody needed to explain this to us. We felt it in the back of the skull after twenty minutes on the phone: the strange mix of stimulation and depletion, like eating a whole packet of crisps for supper. Full of something. Nourished by nothing.

But attention has changed because the internet has changed. The web is filling with language that resembles language without having passed through a life. Clean little answers. Cheerful summaries. Posts that arrive with all the texture of a hotel corridor. They may be useful. They may even be correct. But they have not stood at a bus stop in the rain, forgotten why they walked into the kitchen, or had to sit with a sentence for three days because it would not behave.

So perhaps the first new rule is this: give people evidence that you were here.

Not performative authenticity. I do not need another stranger telling me they are “showing up as their whole self” beside a beige carousel. I mean the signs of actual contact: the grit on the walking boots, the awkward conversation at the café, the book with its spine cracked open on the table, the particular thought that arrived while you were taking the bins out.

A person’s attention still goes where they sense a living presence.

The second rule: do not make your reader pay for your neediness.

A lot of the attention economy runs on an unspoken demand: stay with me, validate me, complete the circuit. But writing can offer a different arrangement. You can give someone a room to think in. You can leave a door open. You can hand them a question worth taking on a walk.

The reader may not remember every word. They may remember that your piece slowed something down inside them. That it returned them to their own life with a little more curiosity.

That seems a fairer trade.

And the third rule may be the most difficult: make things that release attention back into the world.

The feed wants us facing inward, locked in the bright little casino of the screen. The barefoot philosopher wants to close the laptop and notice the birds having some kind of meeting in the hedge. He wants to read a paragraph, then look out of the window for ten minutes. He wants the internet to lead back to the street, the body, the unfinished conversation, the book waiting by the bed.

Maybe that is where blogging comes back into its own.

A blog does not have to chase you through every room of your life. It can sit there like a small public bench. You visit when you feel like it. Someone has left a note. Perhaps it is useful. Perhaps it sends you elsewhere. Perhaps it reminds you that another human being is trying to make sense of being alive under the same strange sky.

The new rules of attention may have less to do with capturing it than deserving it.

And the people worth reading may be the ones who know when to give it back.

---

If this post gave you something to carry into your day, consider supporting my work by buying me a coffee or making a monthly donation or subscribing (free) to the blog.